All Insights
6 Phases of STO Excellence
Take the STO Assessment →
Reliox
6 Phases of Shutdown & Turnaround Excellence
60 Questions · TAR Lifecycle
TAR Lifecycle
Full lifecycle from initiation to continuous improvement. Each phase builds on the last — every day of overrun costs $1-5M in lost production. All phases equally weighted, simple average scoring.
TAR Cycle
Continuous Loop
1 Initiation & Strategy
Scope definition, risk assessment, stakeholder alignment 10 questions
2 Planning & Preparation
Work list development, scheduling, resource mobilization 10 questions
3 Execution Management
Field supervision, safety, quality, daily progress tracking 10 questions
4 Commissioning & Startup
Pre-startup safety review, phased restart, handover 10 questions
5 Close-Out & Review
Lessons learned, cost reconciliation, performance analysis 10 questions
6 Continuous Improvement
Benchmarking, KPI trending, best practice integration 10 questions
Project Timeline Intensity
P1: Initiate
P2: Plan
P3: Prepare
P4: EXECUTE HIGH INTENSITY
P5: Close
P6
T-18 months
T-12 months
T-3 months
EXECUTION
T+6 wks
T+3 mo
All phases: equal weight
Simple average scoring
Total: 60q
$ 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0
PER DAY OVERRUN
Maturity Scale (1.0 – 5.0)
Innocent
< 1.8
Aware
1.8 - 2.6
Developing
2.6 - 3.4
TARGET
Competent
3.4 - 4.2
Excellent
≥ 4.2
Cost of Overrun
Every Day Overrun Costs $1-5M HIGH STAKES
$0
per day lost production
during overrun
0%
typical overrun longer
vs. planned duration
<5%
best-in-class variance
on-time, on-budget
Planned duration
Baseline
Typical overrun
+25-50%
Reactive vs. Excellence
Reactive VS Excellence
25-50%
<5%
Budget Overrun
20-40%
On-time
Schedule Overrun
Multiple
Zero Harm
Safety Incidents
The Business Case
Cost Reduction 15-30% reduction in total turnaround cost
Daily Overrun Cost $1-5M daily cost of unplanned overrun
Without Excellence 25-50% typical budget overrun without excellence program
Safety Target Zero Harm safety target with mature STO process
Turnaround duration reduction through better planning -20-35%
Budget variance improvement < ±5%
Safety performance with zero harm philosophy -80% incidents
Asset availability increase from shorter turnarounds +10-15 days/yr