R
Reliox
Progress Step 1 of 12

RCM Compliance Assessment

Benchmark your Reliability-Centered Maintenance process against SAE JA1011/JA1012 international standards. Is your RCM really RCM? Find out in 20 minutes.

Based on proven standards:

  • SAE JA1011:2009 — Evaluation Criteria for RCM Processes
  • SAE JA1012:2011 — A Guide to the RCM Standard

After completion you will receive:

  • Overall compliance percentage and compliance level (1-5)
  • Section-by-section analysis across all 8 SAE JA1011 sections
  • Critical gap identification with hard-gate checks
  • Improvement roadmap and comprehensive report via email

Assessment Structure (52 scored questions across 8 sections):

◆ S1: Operating Context & Functions (7 q)
◆ S2: Functional Failures (5 q)
◆ S3: Failure Modes (8 q)
◆ S4: Failure Effects (6 q)
◆ S5: Failure Consequences (7 q)
◆ S6: Proactive Tasks (8 q)
◆ S7: Default Actions (6 q)
◆ S8: Living Program (5 q)

Important Disclaimer: This assessment is a self-evaluation tool for educational and awareness purposes. It does NOT constitute formal SAE JA1011 certification or third-party audit verification. Organizations seeking formal compliance verification should engage qualified RCM auditors.

All answers are confidential. Your data is processed securely and never shared with third parties.

Company Information

Tell us about your organization so we can benchmark your results.

Section 1 of 8 7 questions

Operating Context & Functions

JA1011 §5.1 — Functions and Performance Standards: The RCM process must define the operating context of the asset/system and identify all functions with measurable performance standards.

1. Does your RCM process begin with clearly defining the operating context of the asset/system?

JA1011 §5.1.1 — Operating context includes: duty cycle, environment, quality standards, safety requirements

2. Are primary functions documented with measurable performance standards (e.g., flow rates, temperatures, tolerances)?

JA1011 §5.1.2 — Example: 'Transfer water at 100 m³/hr at 3 bar pressure'

3. Are secondary functions (safety, containment, comfort, appearance, regulatory compliance) identified?

JA1011 §5.1.3 — Secondary functions often outnumber primary functions

4. Are protective device functions clearly defined, including what they protect against and their desired reliability?

JA1011 §5.1.4 — Example: 'Relieve overpressure to protect vessel from rupture, available 99.9% of time'

5. Are functions stated in a way that makes the performance standard measurable and the failure state recognizable?

JA1011 §5.1.2 — Good: 'Pump 100 m³/hr' / Poor: 'Pump fluid'

6. Is the boundary of the system under analysis clearly defined before analysis begins?

JA1011 §5.1.1 — Define what's IN and OUT of scope

7. Are function definitions developed with input from operations, maintenance, AND engineering?

JA1012 §3 — Cross-functional input ensures completeness

Section 2 of 8 5 questions

Functional Failures

JA1011 §5.2 — Functional Failures: All reasonably likely failure states for each function must be identified, including total and partial loss of function.

8. Does your process identify all reasonably likely ways each function can fail (total loss AND partial loss)?

JA1011 §5.2.1 — Partial loss example: 'Pump delivers only 60 m³/hr instead of 100'

9. Are functional failures defined as the inability to fulfill a function to a standard acceptable to the user?

JA1011 §5.2.1 — 'User' = the organization, not just operators

10. Do you consider both upper and lower performance limits when defining failures?

JA1011 §5.2.2 — Over-performance can be a failure (e.g., cooling system making product too cold)

11. For protective devices, is 'fails to operate when needed' identified as a functional failure?

JA1011 §5.2.1 — Hidden failures of protective devices are critical

12. Are functional failures clearly linked to the specific function they relate to?

JA1011 §5.2.1 — Traceability is essential for audit

Section 3 of 8 8 questions

Failure Modes

JA1011 §5.3 — Failure Modes: All failure modes reasonably likely to cause each functional failure must be identified at a level of detail that allows selection of an appropriate maintenance policy.

13. Does your process identify all failure modes reasonably likely to cause each functional failure?

JA1011 §5.3.1 — 'Reasonably likely' = has happened OR could happen based on experience

14. Are failure modes described with enough detail to select an appropriate maintenance policy?

JA1011 §5.3.2 — Poor: 'Pump fails' / Good: 'Impeller erodes due to cavitation'

15. Do failure mode descriptions include the ROOT CAUSE, not just the failure itself?

JA1011 §5.3.2 — Include WHY it fails: wear, corrosion, fatigue, human error

16. Do you include failure modes that have happened before on this or similar equipment?

JA1011 §5.3.1 — Use maintenance history, industry databases

17. Are failure modes currently being prevented by existing maintenance included in the analysis?

JA1011 §5.3.1 — Don't assume current PM is optimal — analyze anyway

18. Do you distinguish between age-related failures (predictable wear-out) and random failures (no age relationship)?

JA1012 §7.3 — This determines if scheduled replacement is effective

19. Are failure modes categorized by root cause type (deterioration, design deficiency, human error, external event)?

JA1011 §5.3.2 — Helps identify systemic issues

20. Is the level of analysis consistent across similar equipment types?

JA1012 §6.3 — Avoid over-analyzing some assets while under-analyzing others

Section 4 of 8 6 questions

Failure Effects

JA1011 §5.4 — Failure Effects: The effects of each failure mode must describe what happens when it occurs, assuming no proactive maintenance is done.

21. Does your process document what happens when each failure mode occurs, assuming NO proactive maintenance is done?

JA1011 §5.4.1 — Describe the 'unmitigated' scenario

22. Do failure effects describe the evidence that a failure has occurred (how operators know)?

JA1011 §5.4.2 — Alarms, visual signs, performance changes

23. Are safety hazards and environmental impacts clearly identified in failure effects?

JA1011 §5.4.2 — Be specific: not 'risk of injury' but 'risk of burn injury from steam release'

24. Is the impact on operations/production documented with quantifiable estimates where possible?

JA1011 §5.4.2 — 'Production loss of X units' or 'Downtime of Y hours'

25. Are resources required for repair documented (time, people, parts, special tools)?

JA1011 §5.4.2 — Helps with spare parts and resource planning

26. Do you distinguish between local effects (at the component) and system effects (downstream impact)?

JA1011 §5.4.1 — Both are needed for complete picture

Section 5 of 8 7 questions

Failure Consequences

JA1011 §5.5 — Failure Consequences — THE DECISION DRIVER: Consequences determine the maintenance strategy. They must be categorized into Hidden, Safety, Environmental, Operational, and Non-operational.

27. Does your process categorize consequences into ALL FIVE categories: Hidden, Safety, Environmental, Operational, and Non-operational?

JA1011 §5.5.1 — All 5 required! Non-operational = only repair cost, no production impact

28. Are hidden failures (protective device failures with no direct impact) identified and analyzed separately?

JA1011 §5.5.2 — Hidden failures expose the organization to MULTIPLE FAILURE risk

29. For hidden failures, is the associated multiple failure scenario identified?

JA1011 §5.5.2 — Example: 'If backup fails AND primary fails, then total loss of cooling'

30. Is the distinction made between safety/environmental consequences (risk to people/planet) and operational/economic consequences?

JA1011 §5.5.1 — This drives DIFFERENT task selection criteria

31. Are consequences assessed assuming the failure mode occurs and is NOT prevented?

JA1011 §5.5.1 — Baseline = no maintenance intervention

32. Does consequence categorization DRIVE task selection (not the other way around)?

JA1011 §5.5.1 — Wrong: 'We do PM, so it's not critical' / Right: 'It's critical, so we need PM'

33. Are regulatory and compliance consequences considered where applicable?

JA1011 §5.5.3 — License to operate, legal liability

Section 6 of 8 8 questions

Proactive Tasks & Task Selection

JA1011 §5.6 — Proactive Tasks: A structured decision logic must be used to select technically feasible and worth-doing maintenance tasks based on consequence category.

34. Does your process use a structured decision logic (decision tree/diagram) to select maintenance tasks based on consequences?

JA1011 §5.6.1 — The decision logic is the HEART of RCM

35. Are on-condition tasks (condition monitoring, inspections) evaluated for technical feasibility?

JA1011 §5.6.2 — Feasible if: P-F interval is long enough AND failure is detectable

36. Are scheduled restoration tasks (overhauls, rebuilds) evaluated for technical feasibility?

JA1011 §5.6.3 — Only feasible for age-related failure modes with defined wear-out

37. Are scheduled discard/replacement tasks evaluated for technical feasibility?

JA1011 §5.6.4 — Only feasible for age-related failures; often mandated for safety items

38. For on-condition tasks, is the task interval set at less than half the P-F interval?

JA1012 §9.2 — Formula: Task interval ≤ P-F interval ÷ 2

39. Is 'task worth' evaluated: cost-benefit for operational consequences, risk reduction for safety/environmental?

JA1011 §5.6.1 — Different criteria for different consequence categories

40. Are task intervals based on failure characteristics and data, not arbitrary schedules or OEM recommendations alone?

JA1011 §5.6.1 — OEM may be conservative; use YOUR operating context

41. For hidden failures, is the goal to reduce multiple failure probability to a tolerable level?

JA1011 §5.6.2 — Failure-finding interval depends on required availability

Section 7 of 8 6 questions

Default Actions

JA1011 §5.7 — Default Actions — Completing the Analysis: When no proactive task is feasible and worth doing, default actions must be assigned. Every failure mode must receive a decision.

42. When no proactive task is technically feasible AND worth doing, are default actions assigned?

JA1011 §5.7.1 — Every failure mode gets a decision — no gaps

43. For hidden failures with no applicable proactive task, is failure-finding scheduled?

JA1011 §5.7.2 — Test the protective device at defined intervals

44. Is the failure-finding interval calculated based on required availability and failure rate?

JA1012 §8.2 — FFI formula considers acceptable multiple failure probability

45. For safety/environmental consequences with no applicable proactive task, is redesign mandatory?

JA1011 §5.7.3 — No 'accept the risk' option for safety — must redesign

46. For operational/non-operational consequences, is run-to-failure only accepted when it's the most cost-effective option?

JA1011 §5.7.4 — RTF is a valid strategy when consequences are purely economic

47. Is every maintenance task (or deliberate lack of task) traceable back to a specific failure mode and consequence?

JA1011 §5.7.1 — Audit trail from analysis to work order

Section 8 of 8 5 questions

Living Program & Implementation

JA1012 — Implementation Requirements: RCM must be performed by cross-functional teams with competent facilitation. Analyses must be kept current as a living program.

48. Is your RCM analysis performed by cross-functional teams with operations, maintenance, AND engineering representation?

JA1012 §12.1 — Minimum: operator, maintainer, technical specialist, facilitator

49. Are RCM facilitators trained and demonstrated competent in the SAE JA1011 methodology?

JA1012 §12.2 — Training alone is not enough — verify competence

50. Is there a formal process to update analyses when changes occur (modifications, new failure experience, operating context changes)?

JA1012 §11.1 — RCM is a LIVING program, not a one-time project

51. Are analysis results formally reviewed and approved before implementation?

JA1012 §12.3 — Management sign-off ensures commitment

52. Is there a feedback loop from maintenance execution to improve future RCM analyses?

JA1012 §11.2 — Actual failure data improves analysis accuracy

Additional Context

Almost done! Help us tailor your report with a few final questions.

Your RCM Compliance Results

--

--

--

Section JA1011 Ref Score Status

Disclaimer: This assessment is a self-evaluation tool for educational and awareness purposes. It does NOT constitute formal SAE JA1011 certification or third-party audit verification.

A detailed report will be sent to your email. Questions? Contact us at info@reliox.ai