R
Reliox
Progress Step 1 of 10
TPM Pillar 2 Deep-Dive Assessment

Planned Maintenance Deep-Dive Assessment

Keikaku Hozen — JIPM Pillar 2

This deep-dive assessment examines your Planned Maintenance practices across 27 detailed questions in 6 subcategories, covering the full maintenance strategy spectrum from equipment criticality ranking through CMMS utilization, preventive maintenance program design, predictive technologies, and spare parts management.

Unlike the main TPM assessment which covers all 8 pillars at a high level, this deep-dive provides a granular view of your planned maintenance maturity — identifying specific strengths and improvement opportunities within your proactive maintenance strategy.

27 questions across 6 subcategories · 20-25 minutes

  • ◆ 2.1 Equipment Criticality & Classification (4 questions)
  • ◆ 2.2 Preventive Maintenance Program (5 questions)
  • ◆ 2.3 Predictive & Condition-Based Maintenance (5 questions)
  • ◆ 2.4 Maintenance Planning & Scheduling (5 questions)
  • ◆ 2.5 CMMS Utilization & Data Management (4 questions)
  • ◆ 2.6 Spare Parts & Materials Management (4 questions)

Completed the main TPM assessment? This deep-dive builds on your Pillar 2 results.

Important Disclaimer: This assessment is a self-evaluation tool for educational and awareness purposes. Results do NOT constitute formal TPM certification or professional audit. Organizations seeking formal TPM implementation audits should engage qualified JIPM-certified professionals.

All answers are confidential. Your data is processed securely and never shared with third parties.

Company Information

Tell us about your organization so we can benchmark your results.

Subcategory 1 of 6 4 questions

2.1 Equipment Criticality & Classification

Focus: Establishing a formal equipment hierarchy and criticality ranking that drives differentiated maintenance strategies based on safety, environmental, production, and cost impact.

1. Has a formal equipment criticality assessment (e.g., ABC ranking) been completed for all maintainable assets?

2. Is the criticality ranking actively used to differentiate maintenance strategies across criticality classes?

3. How accurate and complete is the equipment hierarchy and asset register in your CMMS?

4. Is there a process to re-assess equipment criticality when operating conditions, consequences, or regulatory requirements change?

Subcategory 2 of 6 5 questions

2.2 Preventive Maintenance Program

Focus: Designing PM tasks based on failure data and RCM logic rather than calendar-only intervals, with consistent compliance and systematic optimization.

5. Are PM tasks defined based on manufacturer recommendations, failure history, and/or RCM logic rather than calendar schedules alone?

6. Do PM procedures include detailed steps, safety requirements, tools, materials, and time estimates?

7. Is PM compliance rate tracked and managed as a key maintenance KPI with a target above 90%?

8. Is PM task effectiveness reviewed using failure data, with ineffective tasks revised or eliminated?

9. Are PM intervals optimized using condition data and failure history rather than fixed time periods alone?

Subcategory 3 of 6 5 questions

2.3 Predictive & Condition-Based Maintenance

Focus: Deploying condition-based monitoring technologies on critical equipment, including vibration analysis, thermography, ultrasonic testing, and oil analysis.

10. Are condition-based monitoring technologies deployed on critical rotating equipment (vibration, thermography, ultrasonics, oil analysis)?

11. Is PdM data collected on defined routes with consistent measurement points and alarm levels?

12. Do PdM results trigger work orders before functional failure, with effective P-F interval management?

13. Is PdM technology coverage adequate for equipment criticality, with A-critical assets receiving full monitoring coverage?

14. Is PdM data trended and analyzed to predict remaining useful life and optimize intervention timing?

Subcategory 4 of 6 5 questions

2.4 Maintenance Planning & Scheduling

Focus: Dedicated planning function that prepares complete work packages, with disciplined scheduling and backlog management.

15. Is there a dedicated maintenance planner role that prepares complete work order packages (scope, materials, tools, procedures, permits, duration)?

16. Is a weekly maintenance schedule created and frozen, with schedule compliance tracked (target above 85%)?

17. Is the maintenance backlog managed with aging analysis and priority-based execution?

18. Is planning quality validated through metrics such as jobs completing on time, materials availability, and absence of rework?

19. Is emergency and reactive work minimized through effective planning, with the reactive ratio below 25%?

Subcategory 5 of 6 4 questions

2.5 CMMS Utilization & Data Management

Focus: Consistent use of the CMMS for all maintenance activities with high data quality, accurate failure coding, and reports that drive decisions.

20. Is the CMMS used consistently for all work orders with completion rates above 90% and accurate failure coding?

21. Is CMMS data quality audited regularly (asset hierarchy accuracy, failure codes, work order completion)?

22. Are CMMS reports (KPIs, trends, costs) used in management decision-making rather than just for data storage?

23. Is equipment maintenance history captured in the CMMS with sufficient detail for failure analysis and strategy review?

Subcategory 6 of 6 4 questions

2.6 Spare Parts & Materials Management

Focus: Formal spare parts strategy differentiating insurance, operating, and repairable spares with documented min/max levels based on consumption analysis.

24. Is there a formal spare parts strategy that differentiates insurance spares, operating spares, and repairable spares?

25. Are min/max stock levels based on consumption analysis, lead times, and equipment criticality?

26. Are spare parts linked to equipment BOMs in the CMMS for automatic identification during maintenance planning?

27. Are procurement lead times tracked and factored into PM planning, with vendor-managed inventory for high-consumption items?

Additional Context

Help us tailor your recommendations. All fields are optional.

Assessment Complete!

Here are your Planned Maintenance maturity results.

Overall PM Maturity Score

—

out of 5.0

Subcategory Performance

Subcategory Breakdown

Subcategory Score Maturity Gap to 4.2

Priority Improvement Areas

Recommended Resources

What’s Next?

A detailed report with personalized recommendations will be sent to your email shortly.

P1
P1: Autonomous Maintenance

27 questions across 6 AM subcategories
T
Main TPM Assessment

48 questions across all 8 TPM pillars

Questions? Contact us at info@reliox.ai